logo

Let’s discuss your legal query

Give us a call or drop by anytime, we endeavour to answer all enquiries within 24 hours on business days.

Find us

11 & 11 A, Golf Apartments, Golf Links,
New Delhi – 110003

Email us

info@vchambers.in
litigation@vchambers.in

Phone support

Phone: (011) 4354-5764

Provocative Clothing or Problematic Mindset

  • By Vidula Mehrotra
  • September 21, 2022
  • 57 Views

Article Published in LinkedIn.

The Kerala High Court has found the order of Kozhikode session court, in the much talked sexual harassment case of author Civic Chandran, non-justifiable. The court also stayed the order granting anticipatory bail to the accused till the appeal is disposed of.

The court observed that “prima facie it appears that there was an improper exercise of jurisdiction by the Session Judge while granting bail to the accused. Irrelevant materials of substantial nature are seen relied on to grant bail.”

This stay on the bail application has come after a series of protests by the people dismayed by the judge’s remark.

While granting bail, the Sessions Court heavily relied on certain photographs of the victim which were published on social media and observed that the complainant herself is ‘exposed to sexually provocative dresses’ therefore Section 354-A will not prima facie stand against the accused.

The Supreme court, in several cases, has held that discussion about the dress, behaviour, past conduct, and morals of the victim should not enter the verdict while granting bail to the accused as it makes women more susceptible to unwanted trauma.

The Apex court previously, in several landmark judgments, has given paramount importance to women’s rights, such as participation in defence forces, triple talaq or protection of women at the workplace.

However, based on the Order of the Session Judge, it seems we have a long way to go considering that every day we get to hear incidents where women are denied their basic dignity. Although this month we have marked 75 years of independence, the mindset of some lawmakers and guardians of law is not independent of the patriarchal narrative.

This is not the first time we have seen this type of victim blaming being done by the same people who are entrusted to uphold the dignity of every individual of this nation. Last year, a member of the National Commission for Women blamed a 50-year-old woman for going out alone in the evening which made her susceptible to gang rape.

All of these instances and assertions demonstrate how justice and equality for women continue to be distant goals. The problem does not lie with the choice of clothing, it is more deep-rooted, it lies with the patriarchal mindset.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Disclaimer and Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India law firms are prohibited from advertising and soliciting work. The website is meant solely for information and not for advertising. By clicking on I AGREE the user acknowledges the following:

  • That there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website.
  • That all the information, publications and legal commentary provided on www.vchambers.in is only for illustrative purposes and should not be regarded or relied upon as legal advice.
  • That the receipt or use of this website does not create any lawyer-client relationship and that we are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by you relying on the data provided on this website.
  • That you are visiting the website of the firm voluntarily and on your own free will and not by any advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members
  • That the content published on the website is the copyright of Vardharma Chambers
  • That you hereby also agree to the privacy policy of Vardharma Chambers.
  • That if you have any legal issues, you, in all cases, must seek independent legal advice.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies.